America’s biggest retail store chain is being taken back to court after a lawsuit argued that the corporation has been knowingly overcharging customers in six different states.
Deceptive Practises at Walmart
Walmart is set to face a class-action lawsuit over allegations that the multinational retail giant engaged in “deceptive and unfair pricing practices” over the years.
Overcharging at the Checkout
The lawsuit was filed by plaintiff Yoram Kahn, who claims that Walmart systematically overcharged its customers, by charging them more at the cash register than the advertised cost of items on store shelves.
Hundreds of Millions in Profit
While the difference between prices on the shelves and prices at checkout was largely minimal, it was enough to “add up to hundreds of millions of dollars each year,” according to the lawsuit.
“Pervasive and Continuous” Pricing Practices
“Kahn alleges that Walmart is aware of these discrepancies between shelf prices and register prices and that its unfair and deceptive pricing practices are pervasive and continuous,” the lawsuit states.
Dismissal Reversed
The lawsuit has been ongoing since early 2023. It was initially dismissed by US District Judge Sara Ellis in Chicago in March 2023. Now, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago has officially reversed the lower court ruling.
Consumers Can Come Forward
The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago issued a court order last Thursday in favor of the lawsuit, granting consumers the right to come forward and prove that the corporation has violated consumer protection laws.
Potential Violation of Consumer Protection Laws
The appeals court asserted that if these “bait-and-switch” pricing strategies could be proven, it would constitute a violation of relevant consumer protection laws found in several states where Walmart operates.
A Reasonable Expectation
Circuit Judge David Hamilton also stated that the lawsuit was correct in claiming that consumers should reasonably excerpt prices displayed on retail shelves to match the prices given at the register.
Khan’s Shopping Experience
The lawsuit stems from Kahn’s own experiences as a Walmart shopper. While shopping at a store in Niles, Illinois on August 2, 2022, Kahn purchased 15 items from the shelves.
6 Items Marked Up
However, when the items were scanned at the register, Khan was confused by the final price, which was significantly higher than the calculations he had made prior to purchase. He later realized that 6 of the 15 items had been marked up by 10-15% higher than the prices listed on the shelves.
Small Change for Some, Big Profit for Walmart
“In total, Kahn paid Walmart $1.89 in overcharges on these six items, nearly seven percent of the pretax total of his bill,” the appeals court noted. “Small change for Kahn as an individual, no doubt, but keep in mind the volume of Walmart’s business.”
Other State’s Affected
Khan’s lawsuit then pointed to other Walmart locations in Florida, Indiana, Maryland, New Jersey, and New York, where similar price discrepancies could be observed.
Are Receipts Enough?
Walmart initially responded to the lawsuit by claiming that receipts provided following a purchase were enough to subvert allegations of unfairness since they truthfully presented the actual price to customers.
Court Dismisses Walmart’s Claims
However, the court bluntly dismissed Walmart’s claim, and its effectiveness, in its court statement.
Rejecting It’s Theory
“We reject the theory that providing a customer with a receipt after payment stating the actual price charged is sufficient, at least as a matter of law,” the court statement reads. “To dispel any potential deception or unfairness caused by an inaccurate shelf price.”
Unreasonable Expectations
Attorneys defending Kahn also claimed that it was unreasonable for Walmart to expect its customers to be able to make note of all the discrepancies between prices listed on shelves and at checkout.
“Customers Will Not Undertake Such Audits”
Judge Hamilton agreed with the statement in the court ruling, writing: “Who does that? For obvious reasons, consumers will not undertake such audits.”
Not the First Pricing Dispute
Khan’s lawsuit is just the next in a line of legal disputes involving Walmart and its perceived pricing problems. Back in June this year Walmart paid $1.64 million to settle a New Jersey lawsuit.
New Jersey Lawsuit
The lawsuit alleged that Walmart had “repeatedly engaged in unlawful unit pricing practices” in 64 locations across the state.
2021 Lawsuit in North Carolina
In 2021 two North Carolina locations were fined for “repeated and excessive scanning charges,” which caused customers to be charged more than the store price for items they had purchased.
23 Steep Taxes Adding to California Residents’ Burden
California: a place of sunshine, innovation, and, unfortunately, some of the nation’s highest taxes. From LA’s beaches to Silicon Valley’s tech hubs, residents grapple with a maze of state taxes. Here’s a glance at 23 taxes that might surprise both Californians and outsiders. 23 Steep Taxes Adding to California Residents’ Burden
Cash in on Nostalgia: 21 Toys Now Worth a Fortune
Time to dust off the boxes and find that once-cherished toy from your childhood. For collectors and enthusiasts, these items have become valued objects, and they can be worth big bucks – are there any of these in your attic? Cash in on Nostalgia: 21 Toys Now Worth a Fortune
Millennials Don’t Buy These 19 Products Anymore
Millennials are changing consumer habits, quietly replacing once-staple products and traditions. Often criticized for their disruptive preferences, this generation is reshaping the marketplace with digital expertise, ethical buying, and a taste for the unconventional. Millennials Don’t Buy These 19 Products Anymore
Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / lunopark.
The content of this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute or replace professional financial advice.